U.S. judge extends freeze on Trump's massive "buyout" plan for federal workers-Xinhua

U.S. judge extends freeze on Trump's massive "buyout" plan for federal workers

Source: Xinhua

Editor: huaxia

2025-02-11 06:42:15

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference at the White House in Washington, D.C., the United States, on Jan. 30, 2025. (Xinhua/Hu Yousong)

After a hearing on Monday, the federal judge said that the pause would continue until he ruled on the legality of the "deferred resignation" plan.

WASHINGTON, Feb. 10 (Xinhua) -- A U.S. federal judge on Monday extended a pause on the deadline for roughly two million federal workers to accept the Trump administration's "buyout" offer, which gives seven months of salary to those who opt to leave their jobs.

On Thursday, just hours before the acceptance deadline, Judge George A. O'Toole Jr. from the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts temporarily halted the administration's "buyout" plan.

After a hearing on Monday, the federal judge said that the pause would continue until he ruled on the legality of the "deferred resignation" plan.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced the program in a statement on Jan. 28, with the original deadline set for Feb. 6. "If you resign under this program, you will retain all pay and benefits regardless of your daily workload and will be exempted from all applicable in-person work requirements until September 30, 2025," the statement read.

More than 60,000 employees have already agreed to resign as part of President Donald Trump's effort to rapidly reduce the government workforce, according to a report by NBC news. That accounts for roughly 3 percent of the 2 million federal employees deemed eligible for "deferred resignation."

Labor unions have challenged the "buyout" program, arguing that OPM overstepped its authority by guaranteeing pay and benefits until the end of September, especially since Congress had only approved funding for most federal agencies until March 14.

The unions also argue that the offer does not take into account potential negative impacts on the government's operational capabilities, imposes an unreasonably tight deadline, and serves as a pretext for dismissing and replacing workers based on ideological reasons. 

Comments

Comments (0)
Send

    Follow us on